Harry Potter

Warning: Spoiler!

Actually just went back to the book and it is explained, somewhat, I'll type up the relevent part.

\"'Precisely!' said Dumbledore. 'He took your blood and rebuilt his living body with it! Your blood is in his veins, Harry. Lily's protection inside both of you! He tethered you to life while he lives!'\"

Chapter 35 (King's Cross) Page number 568.

If I remember rightly, Grawp was around 16 feet tall whilst the average giant is around 20-25 feet.

Warning: Spoiler!

Right! :woohoo: Maybe I should have reread that last book after all.

Dunno. I still feel this blood explanation a bit weird, becasue it keeps a lot of other variations open. In fact, why then didn't both of them die? If Voldemort's body was alive becasue of Harry's blood, why then didn't it die too? Voldemort would have survived becasue of his other horcruxes, but Harry wouldn't because his soul was intact... It seems illogical that Harry would survive becasue he gave a few drops of blood to Voldemort. Voldemort's new body was made of his father's bones + a few drops of Harry's blood + Wormtails hand ergo flesh + the rest of Voldemort's old body or whatever was left of it. - Harry's blood is therefore just a small part... :huh:

Now that I've watched the movie I shall deliver my verdict. I was very happy with the movie but one thing really annoyed me - why did Harry get rid of the hallows? I don't think he did that in the book. I may need to re-read it though...
But reguardless of that I think it was very good. The dragon was extra awesome! :laugh: I'm just really sad it had to end.

iHauntTheSepulchre wrote:

Now that I've watched the movie I shall deliver my verdict. I was very happy with the movie but one thing really annoyed me - why did Harry get rid of the hallows? I don't think he did that in the book. I may need to re-read it though...
But reguardless of that I think it was very good. The dragon was extra awesome! :laugh: I'm just really sad it had to end.

I'll put it into spoiler just to be on the safe side:

Warning: Spoiler!

I can't remember what he exactly did with the stone in the books, but I remember he returned the wand to Dumbledore's grave after he fixed his own broken wand - he didn't destroy it as he did in the movie, at least as I remember from the books. They didn't show what he did with the invisibility cloak in the movie but I assume he kept it too like he did in the books (he later on gave it to his children.

black_magnolia wrote:

iHauntTheSepulchre wrote:

Now that I've watched the movie I shall deliver my verdict. I was very happy with the movie but one thing really annoyed me - why did Harry get rid of the hallows? I don't think he did that in the book. I may need to re-read it though...
But reguardless of that I think it was very good. The dragon was extra awesome! :laugh: I'm just really sad it had to end.

I'll put it into spoiler just to be on the safe side:

Warning: Spoiler!

I can't remember what he exactly did with the stone in the books, but I remember he returned the wand to Dumbledore's grave after he fixed his own broken wand - he didn't destroy it as he did in the movie, at least as I remember from the books. They didn't show what he did with the invisibility cloak in the movie but I assume he kept it too like he did in the books (he later on gave it to his children.

Warning: Spoiler!

I think Harry used the stone to call his parents while he was going to Voldemort to kill him. And after that he lost/threw it somewhere in the wood. I'm not sure but I think so.